Did Khrushchev Really Bang His Shoe at the UN?

The Shoe That May Never Have Fallen

Lorenzo Sumulong stood at the rostrum of the UN General Assembly on October 12, 1960, telling the hall that the peoples of Eastern Europe had been "deprived of the free exercise of their civil and political rights" and "swallowed up, so to speak, by the Soviet Union"³. Nikita Khrushchev, seated with the Soviet delegation, did not wait for a formal reply. He came to the rostrum on a point of order, brushed Sumulong aside with an upward sweep of his arm, and began a denunciation that branded the Filipino senator a "jerk, a stooge, and a lackey" of American imperialism^3,4.

Somewhere in the commotion that followed, Khrushchev ended up holding a shoe. What he did with it next became one of the most repeated images of the Cold War, and nobody who was in the room, or who has studied the room since, fully agrees on it^7,9,10.

The session was part of the General Assembly's 15th session, which had opened a month earlier under the weight of decolonization and the escalating rivalry between the Soviet and American blocs^1,5. The item on the floor was a Soviet-backed resolution calling for independence for colonial peoples, a proposal that put Moscow in the position of lecturing the West on freedom while governing an empire of its own in Eastern Europe^1,2. Sumulong, a Filipino senator and son of the nationalist leader Juan Sumulong, used his turn at the microphone to say exactly that¹¹.

Assembly President Frederick Boland cautioned Sumulong to avoid provoking further interruptions but let him keep speaking, and sent Khrushchev back to his seat³. That did not end it. According to several accounts, Khrushchev pounded his fists on the desk as Sumulong continued, and at some point picked up a shoe^3,10. The New York Times published the story that made it famous on October 13, under the headline "Khrushchev Bangs His Shoe on Desk," reporting that he removed his right shoe, raised it toward Sumulong, and struck the desk with it while demanding the criticism stop^5,10. The reporter who wrote it, Benjamin Welles, had not seen the moment himself; his account relied on other reports from the floor^5,6.

Other people who were actually there tell a quieter story. New York Times correspondent James Feron, who was present, said flatly: "I actually saw Khrushchev not bang his shoe." He recalled that Khrushchev "leaned over, took off a slip-on shoe, waved it pseudomenacingly, and put it on his desk, but he never banged his shoe"^7,8. Life photographer John Loengard, also in the room, said Khrushchev did not strike the desk, though he looked ready to⁹. No photograph or film has ever surfaced of the alleged blow. Khrushchev's own son Sergei later said he could find no such image, and that both NBC and CBC searched their archives without turning up footage³.

The explanations for how the shoe got into Khrushchev's hand multiply the longer you look. His granddaughter Nina Khrushcheva and his longtime interpreter Viktor Sukhodrev both said he had taken off his shoes because they were new and tight, and that he grabbed one off the floor after his watch fell off while he was pounding the desk with his fist, which only angered him further³. A former UN staffer gave a stranger version still: she said Khrushchev lost a shoe earlier in the session after a journalist stepped on it, that she retrieved it, wrapped it in a napkin, and handed it back to him, and that he could not get it back on, left it on the floor, and later banged it on the desk, a detail she said she personally witnessed³. Khrushchev's own memoirs add a third, contradictory story, claiming the incident happened during a different speech about Spain's Franco regime, a claim his editors noted does not match contemporary reporting from the actual date³.

What is not in dispute is how the meeting ended. A Romanian official joined the shouting, his microphone was cut off, the Eastern Bloc delegations jeered, and Boland adjourned the session by slamming his gavel so hard the head broke off³. Khrushchev was reportedly delighted with his own performance, even as some of his own delegation found it embarrassing³. By the time the story made its way around the world, the picture that stuck was the shoe held high over an angry man's head, whether or not it ever came down.

Who Was in the Room

• Nikita Khrushchev: First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and head of the Soviet delegation, who reacted to Sumulong's speech with a point of order and, by most accounts, a shoe^3,1.
• Lorenzo Sumulong: Filipino senator and head of the Philippine delegation, whose remarks about Soviet control of Eastern Europe triggered the confrontation^4,11.
• Frederick Boland: Irish diplomat and president of the General Assembly, who tried to keep order and ultimately adjourned the chaotic session by breaking his own gavel³.
• James Feron: New York Times correspondent who was present and later insisted Khrushchev waved the shoe but never struck the desk with it^7,8.
• Benjamin Welles: The New York Times reporter whose October 13 article, written without having witnessed the alleged blow himself, gave the incident its lasting shape^5,6.
• Viktor Sukhodrev: Khrushchev's longtime interpreter, who later corroborated that Khrushchev did bang a shoe on the desk after his watch fell off³.

What Still Doesn't Add Up

The core disagreement is simple to state and impossible to settle: some eyewitnesses say Khrushchev struck the desk with his shoe, others who were in the same room say he only waved it or set it down^3,7,9.

No photograph or film has ever confirmed the blow itself, despite searches of American and Canadian television archives³. The widely reproduced image people associate with the moment shows a shoe sitting on the desk near Khrushchev and Soviet foreign minister Andrei Gromyko, not the strike in progress³.

Accounts of how the shoe ended up in his hand conflict directly. His family and interpreter say tight new shoes and a fallen watch explain it³; a former UN staffer describes an earlier mishap where the shoe was lost, retrieved, and handed back wrapped in a napkin³; and Khrushchev's own memoir places a similar incident during an entirely different debate, on a different date, which his editors say does not match the contemporary record³.

Even the footwear itself is disputed. Popular retellings and cartoons often show a heavy boot, but several eyewitnesses describe a slip-on or open shoe, and one later theory traces its possible manufacture to a shipment of West German shoes sent to the Soviet Union^3,7.

Timeline

1. 1960-09The UN General Assembly's 15th session opens in New York, dominated by decolonization debates and Cold War rivalry^1,5.
2. 1960-10-12During the 902nd plenary meeting, Lorenzo Sumulong criticizes Soviet control of Eastern Europe; Khrushchev interrupts, denounces him, and the shoe episode occurs amid chaos that ends with Boland breaking his gavel^3,1,4.
3. 1960-10-13The New York Times publishes "Khrushchev Bangs His Shoe on Desk," the account that fixes the incident in public memory⁵.
4. 2003The New York Times/International Herald Tribune revisits the episode, with eyewitness James Feron denying Khrushchev ever struck the desk^7,8.

Pictures